How close are we?
Read the calculated position against the agreed limit. See how much room remains and where attention is needed.
AGX Finance · Financial review and planning
Financial clarity.Before you decide.
AGX helps your team review financial calculations, trace supporting evidence and compare permitted actions. Make the reasoning accessible beyond the preparer, with your rules and approval in control.
Agentic AI. Independent verification. Mathematical optimization.
Your objectives. Your rules. Your approval.
A nonconfidential discussion with Treasury or Controllership to clarify your financial priority, preparation and whether an evaluation is worthwhile.
01 / One connected financial case
Review the position.
Explore a response.
CRONUS connects covenant review, a four-week collection delay and an optional payment-and-funding response. Start with the evidence; planning builds on the same reviewed constraints.
Start with covenant verification
Read-only review
Can you defend
the calculation?
Review three covenant rules. Trace restricted cash to its source and recorded treatment, and see what becomes uncertain when support is challenged.
The first question is whether a reviewer can understand the conclusion without finding its preparer. Keep source facts, interpretation and review decisions distinct; open the detailed workings when needed.
Read the covenant study & evidenceOptional: respond to a collection delay
The same case, under pressure
A customer pays late.
Which choices still work?
Assess the four-week delay and compare permitted payment dates and borrowing against the reviewed covenant constraints.
The reference plan breaches leverage. The selected plan passes the declared tests, giving up $8,284.50 of modeled net benefit to respect the covenant. Its forecast, permissions and approval are separate from the initial review.
Read the decision & evidenceSynthetic selected AXB1 records, not consolidated CRONUS accounts. Modeled outcomes are not realized savings. ABL verification is complementary and separate from planning. Earlier studies remain available as historical evidence.
02 / Confidence at sign-off
See the headroom.
Find the open questions.
Focus the review on the limit, the adjustments that could change the answer and what still needs resolving.
What changes the answer?
Identify material adjustments and disputed treatments. Review the questions that could change the conclusion.
What still needs review?
Keep missing evidence and unresolved judgments visible. Your team decides what must be settled before sign-off.
03 / The AGX platform
From financial rules
to defensible decisions.
AI, optimization and independent checks work from reviewed facts and rules. Keep the assumptions, approvals and evidence behind each decision together.
Investigate the questions
Explore the synthetic demo at your own pace. Prompt suggestions and recommended card menus guide your review of the figures, supporting evidence and open questions.
Plan within reviewed limits
Build on reviewed covenant constraints with separately reviewed forecasts and permitted choices. Compare costs and trade-offs, then inspect the independently checked results.
Keep review and authority together
A changed input or treatment requires fresh approval. Approval authorizes the specified analysis; it does not submit a certificate or move money.
Return to the original record
Inspect the source figures, review decisions, approvals and results used at the time. Later edits cannot rewrite the basis of an earlier calculation.
Alongside your existing finance process. Qualify each customer agreement and source mapping before evaluation. Your team owns interpretation, source accuracy and sign-off. Synthetic demo access is by invitation.
04 / The decisions that matter
Bigger decisions.
Explicit trade-offs.
Bring the decisions where objectives, financial rules and competing uses of cash interact. Define the model, constraints and evidence needed to evaluate them.
Where should capital go?
Compare competing investments, timing and project dependencies against capital and liquidity limits. Make the priorities and trade-offs explicit.
How should we fund it?
Frame instruments, borrowing and repayment choices around funding cost, covenant limits and refinancing exposure.
Where should cash sit?
Make cash buffers, obligations, transfer restrictions and competing uses of liquidity explicit across entities and periods.
Which plan holds up?
Define the shocks, tolerances and contingency choices that matter. Review the cost of protecting liquidity and covenant headroom.
The studies demonstrate specific synthetic workflows. Each financial decision needs its own reviewed model, source data, forecasts and permissions before an evaluation is agreed.
05 / Pilot scopes
Choose the right scope.
Bring another financial priority to the same discussion. Each planning scope needs its own reviewed forecast, permissions and approval. ABL availability is not connected to the demonstrated planning workflow.
06 / Your questions
What would our team
need to know?
Does AGX replace our finance systems?
Your accounting, treasury and banking systems remain the sources of records and channels for transactions. Customer-created exports can support an initial evaluation, subject to mapping and reconciliation checks. Direct connections need their own qualification.
Is AGX limited to the published studies?
The studies show particular financial workflows. Bring a broader capital, funding, liquidity or risk decision; agree the financial model, source data and acceptance criteria for that scope. A demonstration does not establish support for every agreement or decision.
What does the AI do?
It helps inspect records, ask questions, challenge assumptions and explain returned evidence. Financial tools own the calculations and checks. Your team reviews the meaning and approves the exact analysis; the AI cannot approve its own assumptions.
What do we need for the first check?
Start with one covenant and one completed period. Name a Treasury owner and a Controllership reviewer, then prepare the agreement, supporting schedules and existing calculation after scope and data handling are agreed. See the preparation checklist.
What would a useful evaluation establish?
Can another reviewer explain the calculation and find its support without relying on the preparer? Compare that task with your current process, including preparation, review time, assistance and costs. Correctness alone does not establish business value.
How are security and deployment handled?
Agree the evaluation environment, providers, access, retention, deletion and evidence export before sharing company data. Customer-specific imports and deployment require qualification. Synthetic demonstrations do not establish enterprise security certification, customer readiness or turnkey deployment in your cloud.
Does verification authorize planning or transactions?
Planning is an optional follow-on built on reviewed constraints, with its own forecasts, permitted choices and approval. Covenant verification stands on its own. The read-only offers submit no lender certificates, payment instructions or borrowing transactions. ABL verification is a complementary review and does not feed the demonstrated planning workflow.
07 / Start with one question
One covenant.
One completed period.
Ask Treasury and Controllership to compare the calculation with your reviewed agreement and existing workings. Establish fit, preparation and effort before committing to an evaluation.
Discuss your financial priorityStart with a nonconfidential conversation. No company-data upload is needed. Explore your use case if you’re unsure where to begin.
A short brief to forward to Treasury
Purpose: assess one material covenant for one completed reporting period against the reviewed agreement and independently reviewed workings.
Preparation: the agreement and amendments, debt, cash and earnings schedules, adjustment evidence and existing calculation. Treasury owns the agreement review; Controllership checks the supporting figures.
Success: traceable figures, explained differences and visible open questions. Measure preparation, review effort, assistance and costs. Agree fit, qualification work, fees and data handling before confidential records are shared.