Deploy AI agents without the operational risk.

AGX tests which guardrails hold up against evidence before you rely on them. AGX Lite enforces approved guardrails at runtime, blocking non-compliant actions before they execute.

AGX: diagnostics + guardrail validation · AGX Lite: pre-action enforcement

Two layers, one control path: validate the guardrail first, enforce it only after it is approved.

AGX tests AGX Lite blocks No action without policy Audit chain recorded
Connects to the systems where execution drift already leaves evidence
Databricks Snowflake SAP Salesforce Kafka
The executive problem

AI agents make existing operating leaks move faster.

Executives do not care about guardrails in the abstract. They care about margin, cash, forecast reliability, and control failures. AGX tests the operating guardrails that protect those outcomes before AGX Lite enforces them in live workflows.

01
EBITDA leakage

Margin leakage hides inside everyday execution.

The executive sees

Margin misses, cost overruns, realization leakage, and unexplained variance.

The operating cause

The causes are buried in daily work: stale contract terms, missed recovery, over-servicing, wrong staffing mix, and exceptions resolved too late.

The AGX answer

AGX tests which guardrail would have reduced leakage on past cases, then AGX Lite enforces the approved check before the workflow advances.

02
Cash drag

Cash gets trapped between work done and proof accepted.

The executive sees

DSO pressure, delayed invoicing, slow collections, and messy month-end close.

The operating cause

Value was created, but the evidence needed to bill, collect, approve, or close is missing, late, fragmented, or disputed.

The AGX answer

AGX identifies the evidence boundary that protects cash conversion; AGX Lite requires the approved evidence before the live action proceeds.

03
Authority risk

Control failures become expensive when automation scales them.

The executive sees

Audit findings, policy exceptions, approval bypasses, remediation cost, and loss of trust in automation.

The operating cause

An agent can move faster than the approval chain. Without a tested boundary, it can act on incomplete evidence or outside delegated authority.

The AGX answer

AGX validates the permitted action boundary before deployment; AGX Lite blocks, routes, or requests review before a non-compliant action executes.

The AGX architecture

From messy data to enforced guardrails.

AGX is not a generic workflow engine, and it is not passive analytics. It is a continuous policy engine that turns operational evidence into enforced business guardrails.

01
Map

standardize fragmented ERP, CRM, PSA, warehouse, and event data into bounded evidence fields

02
Shadow-Test

generate candidate guardrails, backtest them against historical logs, reject weak policies, and tune thresholds

03
Enforce

return allow, block, needs_evidence, or review_required inside existing workflows with explicit degradation rules

04
Operate

let agents prepare packets, request evidence, and route exceptions only inside the approved guardrail

Outcome

An enforced policy checkpoint with source evidence, owner boundaries, inline response states, degradation behavior, and audit history.

AGX vs AGX Lite

The evidence system and the enforcement runtime.

Use AGX when the right guardrail is unknown, untested, or needs evidence before production. Use AGX Lite when an approved guardrail needs to run inside an existing product, workflow, or agent system.

Evidence system

AGX

Operational improvement, measured before action.

AGX reconstructs how work actually flows, finds where value leaks, tests specific guardrails against historical evidence, and uses shadow mode when a change would alter the workflow path.

Best for

Diagnostics, paid pilots, control discovery, process replay, shadow testing, evidence packets, and rollout decisions.

process evidence candidate guardrails measured impact promotion decision
Enforcement runtime

AGX Lite

Real-time guardrails for products and agents.

AGX Lite is embedded at the action point. It does not discover controls, run analysis, or call AI models; it checks the live event against the approved policy, required evidence, and audit rules before the action executes.

Best for

Embedding deterministic decisions into workflow engines, internal tools, finance systems, and AI-agent platforms.

allow needs_evidence review_required block
AGX tests the guardrail. AGX Lite enforces the approved version.
Implemented guardrails

Two enforced policies behind today's AGX Agents.

The same operating model extends to any workflow where decisions, evidence, policies, and outcomes can be reconstructed.

Control roadmap

Where automated guardrails go next

Start with one painful workflow, then extend to adjacent processes once the evidence model and shadow-testing loop are working.

Claims Evidence Guardrail Procurement Policy Gate Renewals Risk Guardrail Compliance Exception Gate Healthcare Revenue Guardrail
Commercial model

Evidence first. Rollout second.

AGX starts read-only. If the data cannot support a shadow-test, you stop. If it can, the pilot backtests candidate guardrails before any production rollout.

See pricing →
Read-only diagnostic $0

Map the evidence schema, reconstruct historical execution, and quantify the risk.

Shadow-testing pilot $15k-$50k

Generate, backtest, reject, and tune candidate guardrails against your past cases.

Production enforcement $60k-$250k+

Run approved guardrails as inline checkpoints while agents operate inside the boundary.

Buyer questions

The questions leaders ask before putting AGX in the critical path.

Short answers for the blockers that usually slow down governed agent adoption: workflow ownership, messy data, availability, and rule authority.

Do you replace our workflow engine?

No. AGX is an inline checkpoint. Temporal, ServiceNow, SAP, or your existing workflow system handles the state machine. AGX handles the decision gate.

How do you handle messy data?

AGX provides the evidence schema and gap analysis. Your data team maps source data into bounded evidence fields; AGX tests whether that evidence can support a guardrail.

What if an inline checkpoint is unavailable?

The degradation behavior is explicit. Depending on the workflow, AGX can fail open with mandatory post-hoc review or fail closed for high-risk cases.

Does the AI learn new rules on its own?

No. AGX searches and tunes candidate guardrails inside a human-defined domain grammar. It rejects weak policies and only promotes the ones that survive historical replay and policy checks.

Start with one guardrail worth testing.

Pick one workflow gate where the wrong rule costs money, delays work, or creates agent risk. AGX will show whether the evidence supports a better guardrail before anything changes in production.

Start a free diagnostic → See how it works Read-only diagnostics · Historical shadow-testing · Inline policy enforcement